A blocking function is necessary for any social platform. I am amazed that world anvil has gotten away this long without implementing one. It's nice to believe that everyone in the community is an angel, but it's not true. Either way, it's better to have something and not need it than need something and not have it.
The idea is good and neccesary for such a large community but I have a concern that it will likely be exploited and misused in some manner. As others have pointed out, echo chambers and gatekeeping cliques are likely to form just based on one person's percieved dislike of another. If implemented, it needs to be heavily scrutinized so as to limit isolating members of the community who may create articles or express themselves in a manner that doesn't always adhere to the norm.
Copyright claims, stalking/parasocial exploitation, escaping an abusive relationship. All of these situations are real, can occur, and can be greatly mitigated by a user's ability to control who can and cannot follow them. I think that there should be layers to this system, such as the ability to remove a follower, remove a follower AND block them from seeing ANYTHING I do on WA, or remove AND block AND open a report form.
This is a good idea, but I have to agree with Chrispy_0 that a block button which can be used even if the user has done nothing wrong is an easy way for an echo chamber to be created, and for users to block someone just because they perceive a dislike from them, even if they have never been toxic or mean. However, I think safety features are a good (and, with the WA community so large, necessary) idea, and it should be possible to remove a follower. It should definitely not be possible to stop someone liking or viewing public articles. Really, if someone has broken the WA rules, then they should be reported and punished. If someone hasn't broken the WA rules, they have done nothing wrong.
I also found this somewhat troubling recently when I had a falling-out with someone who had been playing in a campaign of mine, and had a character in my world. This person was therefore a subscriber and follower of my world - and it took me quite some time both to figure out how to revoke some of those privileges for them, as well as how to remove their characters from my world. The process to remove their characters from my world was too complicated. I understand making sure I can't delete someone else's character, but we as the owners of the world should be able to easily remove a player character, as well as block/remove followers.
The only thing a block button like the one on Twitter does is make you a member of a rapidly shrinking, insulated echo chamber of yes men that agree with you on everything, and people feigning compliance out of fear of being excluded. Because of this.... I'm all for it! I have never utilized a block button on social media because I generally like reading opinions from people who disagree with me and aren't toxic about it, so it isn't likely I'll ever use one here... But if it helps support those who can't stand being in the presence of someone who disagrees with them, then I am all for it! Everyone that knows me knows how I am and that I wouldn't have written this message any other way, so outside bot/spam accounts I look forward to the challenge of not being the most blocked person on World Anvil!
Allowing people the ability to block is a good way to give users more control over their spaces and reduce the amount of reports moderators need to handle.
I assumed there already was one, troubling that there are followers without blocking.
With the immense size of the website at this point, I think tools for self-curating the user experience by blocking other users are becoming 100% necessary.
I'm sorry to hear of your experiences. I agree that there should be a way to keep individuals you don't want to interact from iteract with your world. Better add this feature now, than it turns into a greater problem later.
As long as blocking someone doesn't prevent them from viewing content, this should just prevent direct forms of contact. Preventing someone's ability to interact with otherwise public pages because of personal grievances/ideological differences is somewhat of a "you problem".
I would also like to add that it would also be useful to be able to remove or block problematic users from the Author's Page as well. The above post makes a valid point. While this has been an enjoyable community, there are some folks who do not work and play well others. Ain't nobody got time for that. On all social medial platforms it is best to block users and move on without causing much of a ruckus, or relying on a slow administrative process, which may not solve anything at all. Giving us a block user option provides us with another tool to prevent unsavory characters from bothering users who just want to be here to create and have a good time.
Absolutely. As nice as the core(?) community is here, we can't run on the assumption that a platform of this size is immune to nasty behaviors from bad actors. Creatives can also become petty out of insecurity, as I'm sure we've all seen before.
This is a must. We shouldn't even have to vote on it. The inability to moderate our own content by removing or blocking toxic or dangerous personalities has already chased away more than one person I've met while on World Anvil. I appreciate all the developers do here, for all of us, but something like this should have been implemented from the start. It's a paid service and we should be able to protect ourselves and our followers from the bad or predatory behaviors of others.
This feels like a no-brainer for any website that allows interaction in 2024.
I've seen communities that, while great, have poor moderation/management tools and leave lot of people with trouble ridding themselves of individuals they would rather not have contact with. I third Hanhula's suggestion of the block/unfollow not showing up on the 'blocked' person's end, allowing the illusion that they still have agency while putting up a virtual 'barrier' between people.
Can't believe this isn't a thing already.
Very timely for me. I have a weird troll (1 of only 2 followers, lol) and I really wish I could drop it off before I do start sending notifications.
This is an incredibly important feature, that I would love to see implemented.
Yes, please! Had a breakaway with two players and it always stings to see their follow in my world remaining.
Would definitely be good. World Anvil seems to be moving forward in a more social-interaction approach which is great, but conflict is inevitable and blocking is an important safety feature.
This feels like a thing similar to Subscriber groups. I wonder how it looks on back-end and how easily it can be implemented. People having more choice over who they interact with would definitely help creating a peaceful space/community, which is why I think this would greatly benefit the creators.
I would love to see something like this in place, and also in support of Hanhula and Vazdimet's suggestions.
Tools like this are important to keep everyone safe. Sometimes it's just a personality crash that's best to avoid, and other times it's necessary to protect yourself until the administration can handle things. I would really really like to see this implemented ASAP
I think this goes along with the goal of moving more social interaction to the World Anvil site itself. I suspect it's quite a bit of development work, but I think it's important to put in that effort.
100% support. The more we move towards being a social-forward platform, the more I'm seeing myself and other friends having really uncomfortable (but not actionable) interactions with other users on the site itself. Such is the nature of social media and large-scale communities, so adopting more of the usual ways to mitigate this would be excellent.
The act of writing bares the soul in some ways, and it's easiest to share those writings when one feels safe. World Anvil has a lovely, uplifting community, but even WA would benefit from more user controls such as blocking and removing followers. Especially as the site grows, and attracts more people. It's always best to have these features in place before they are absolutely needed, and right now the only options for a world owner are to go private or disable community features entirely - which are both rather drastic options. This would allow an option in the middle. (Also, please include user profile comments and follows in this, not just worlds themselves.)
Yes. Please please please add a block function - I do not want to see or receive any form of interactions from a user who has been harassing me. Furthermore, I do not want to see their interactions in the community. If I've blocked someone, I don't want to be able to see their global notifications/posts, or see their comments on other peoples profiles or worlds either. I am very grateful for the recent addition of the report button, but prevention of further interactions is a necessary safety tool for the community :) I am also in favour of Hanhula's suggestion so that blocked individuals do not try to circumvent the measure, either on WA or by trying to interact through other platforms.
I'd especially like it if the user in question wasn't alerted to the block - their like would send no notification & not affect the article's actual likes, but would still show as being liked on their end.