Add an option to block users/remove followers | World Anvil

Remove these ads. Join the Worldbuilders Guild

Add an option to block users/remove followers

New Feature Addition · World management · Created by notahumanhand
accepted

What functionality is missing? What is unsatisfying with the current situation?

There are some people I've met through WorldAnvil that, for one reason or another, have made me uncomfortable. In many of these cases, it's possible to just file a report and for the WorldAnvil team to handle it - however, I've found that a few of these cases don't involve the user doing anything technically wrong. For example, there's a person who I've found I disagree with on a few things I think are very important, and I want to interact with them as little as possible - yet I am reminded of them every time they like one of my articles.  

How does this feature request address the current situation?

Being able to remove a follower from my own world would mean notifications would no longer be sent to them, and they would be less likely to see my articles. Being able to block a user would prevent these interactions entirely. I've found that being able to block people on social media platforms is useful to avoid potential conflict or discomfort without making a big deal of things.  

What are other uses for this feature request?

Being able to block people and prevent interaction with them would mean that people wouldn't necessarily have to make a report for more trivial matters, and wouldn't have to escalate disagreements with other users.

The Team's Response

Hi! This has already been accepted by investigation in the past, and I can confirm it's still on our list to implement.   In the meantime, if you find anyone breaking the Etiquette, you can report them with the community reporting form (also available in the footer of every article on World Anvil)
Current score

127/300 Votes · +31307 points

Votes Cast

  • +1

    by Joshy Shadow
    on 2024-02-28 15:44
  • +100

    by A Roaring Dimensional Horror
    on 2024-02-27 22:06
  • +300

    by A Mischievous Cthulhu
    on 2024-02-27 16:49
  • +300

    by PrincessESH
    on 2024-02-26 22:30
    A blocking function is necessary for any social platform. I am amazed that world anvil has gotten away this long without implementing one. It's nice to believe that everyone in the community is an angel, but it's not true. Either way, it's better to have something and not need it than need something and not have it.
  • -100

    by A Cute Bananafolk
    on 2024-02-26 18:37
  • +300

    by Telarn
    on 2024-02-26 10:37
  • +1

    by Masha Medov
    on 2024-02-26 02:15
  • +100

    by Corwin_Mcgee
    on 2024-02-25 22:03
  • +100

    by jandis
    on 2024-02-25 17:10
    The idea is good and neccesary for such a large community but I have a concern that it will likely be exploited and misused in some manner. As others have pointed out, echo chambers and gatekeeping cliques are likely to form just based on one person's percieved dislike of another. If implemented, it needs to be heavily scrutinized so as to limit isolating members of the community who may create articles or express themselves in a manner that doesn't always adhere to the norm.
  • +300

    by Moonlight Bard
    on 2024-02-25 15:42
    Copyright claims, stalking/parasocial exploitation, escaping an abusive relationship. All of these situations are real, can occur, and can be greatly mitigated by a user's ability to control who can and cannot follow them. I think that there should be layers to this system, such as the ability to remove a follower, remove a follower AND block them from seeing ANYTHING I do on WA, or remove AND block AND open a report form.
  • +100

    by Occasional Anvilite
    on 2024-02-25 15:06
    This is a good idea, but I have to agree with Chrispy_0 that a block button which can be used even if the user has done nothing wrong is an easy way for an echo chamber to be created, and for users to block someone just because they perceive a dislike from them, even if they have never been toxic or mean.   However, I think safety features are a good (and, with the WA community so large, necessary) idea, and it should be possible to remove a follower. It should definitely not be possible to stop someone liking or viewing public articles.   Really, if someone has broken the WA rules, then they should be reported and punished. If someone hasn't broken the WA rules, they have done nothing wrong.
  • +300

    by ValentineDM
    on 2024-02-25 07:32
  • +300

    by A Enfeebled Dryad
    on 2024-02-25 03:29
  • +300

    by HunterChristmas1247
    on 2024-02-25 03:11
  • +100

    by ToothGardener
    on 2024-02-25 02:39
  • +300

    by devinsxdesigns
    on 2024-02-25 02:33
    I also found this somewhat troubling recently when I had a falling-out with someone who had been playing in a campaign of mine, and had a character in my world. This person was therefore a subscriber and follower of my world - and it took me quite some time both to figure out how to revoke some of those privileges for them, as well as how to remove their characters from my world. The process to remove their characters from my world was too complicated. I understand making sure I can't delete someone else's character, but we as the owners of the world should be able to easily remove a player character, as well as block/remove followers.
  • +300

    by CannedStrawberries
    on 2024-02-25 00:12
  • +300

    by PrincessHoneytea
    on 2024-02-24 20:34
  • +300

    by Tris
    on 2024-02-24 20:02
  • +100

    by HGTp
    on 2024-02-24 19:13
  • +100

    by Rayna Fairbell
    on 2024-02-24 16:39
  • +300

    by Stormbril
    on 2024-02-24 16:36
  • +300

    by MLHammond
    on 2024-02-24 16:30
  • +300

    by AlexHarlequin
    on 2024-02-24 16:20
  • +300

    by Aegrist13
    on 2024-02-24 16:02
  • +300

    by CrazyEddie
    on 2024-02-24 15:14
  • +300

    by Kefkejaco
    on 2024-02-24 14:51
  • +1

    by A Sneaky Kobold
    on 2024-02-24 14:41
  • +300

    by Chrispy_0
    on 2024-02-24 14:22
    The only thing a block button like the one on Twitter does is make you a member of a rapidly shrinking, insulated echo chamber of yes men that agree with you on everything, and people feigning compliance out of fear of being excluded. Because of this.... I'm all for it!   I have never utilized a block button on social media because I generally like reading opinions from people who disagree with me and aren't toxic about it, so it isn't likely I'll ever use one here... But if it helps support those who can't stand being in the presence of someone who disagrees with them, then I am all for it!   Everyone that knows me knows how I am and that I wouldn't have written this message any other way, so outside bot/spam accounts I look forward to the challenge of not being the most blocked person on World Anvil!
  • +300

    by Kummer Wolfe
    on 2024-02-24 13:14
  • +300

    by Wolvesbane Manor
    on 2024-02-24 13:09
    Allowing people the ability to block is a good way to give users more control over their spaces and reduce the amount of reports moderators need to handle.
  • +300

    by Demongrey
    on 2024-02-24 12:41
  • +300

    by A Wild Dragon
    on 2024-02-24 12:25
  • +300

    by Hatwolf
    on 2024-02-24 11:59
    It's a basic safety feature!
  • +1

    by Wren2366
    on 2024-02-22 23:35
  • +100

    by Wretched_Tale
    on 2024-02-22 19:02
  • +300

    by themrbeasley
    on 2024-02-22 15:50
  • +300

    by M. Dixon Games
    on 2024-02-22 07:07
  • +100

    by MasterTamari
    on 2024-02-22 05:09
  • +300

    by Renufus
    on 2024-02-22 03:11
  • +300

    by natilee.writes
    on 2024-02-21 06:23
  • +300

    by fwalton
    on 2024-02-20 22:00
  • +100

    by A Revolutionary Cthulhu
    on 2024-02-20 21:17
  • +300

    by Matunas
    on 2024-02-20 18:40
  • +300

    by SoulLink
    on 2024-02-20 17:46
  • +300

    by meowkristen
    on 2024-02-20 13:14
  • +300

    by ccdev
    on 2024-02-20 11:58
    I assumed there already was one, troubling that there are followers without blocking.
  • +300

    by thebwt
    on 2024-02-20 01:53
  • +300

    by noelekko
    on 2024-02-19 20:03
  • +300

    by mirescosmo
    on 2024-02-19 15:39
  • +300

    by Plasma Ring
    on 2024-02-19 08:43
  • +300

    by A Fluffy Mimic
    on 2024-02-19 01:16
  • +300

    by Blue Fairy 74
    on 2024-02-18 06:53
  • +100

    by absimpthe
    on 2024-02-18 03:12
  • +100

    by Alyvins
    on 2024-02-18 02:42
  • +300

    by Auron Bladesong
    on 2024-02-17 20:47
  • +300

    by Graylion
    on 2024-02-17 18:05
    Yes we need this, I still have one follower which is a SpamBot
  • +1

    by PoppaeaSabina
    on 2024-02-17 17:56
  • +300

    by arty
    on 2024-02-17 17:46
    With the immense size of the website at this point, I think tools for self-curating the user experience by blocking other users are becoming 100% necessary.
  • +300

    by Frod0_baggins
    on 2024-02-17 17:31
  • +300

    by TheDoctor292
    on 2024-02-17 16:50
  • +300

    by MageFroghemoth
    on 2024-02-17 13:10
  • +300

    by Hertzbube
    on 2024-02-17 11:17
  • +300

    by Xerolo44
    on 2024-02-17 11:14
  • +300

    by BlubGamer555
    on 2024-02-16 16:11
  • +300

    by DesNordlund
    on 2024-02-16 14:25
    I'm sorry to hear of your experiences. I agree that there should be a way to keep individuals you don't want to interact from iteract with your world. Better add this feature now, than it turns into a greater problem later.
  • +300

    by Qurilion
    on 2024-02-15 12:19
  • +100

    by KyreneRosay
    on 2024-02-15 11:14
  • +300

    by PatheticBarrel
    on 2024-02-15 11:13
  • +300

    by Laor
    on 2024-02-15 05:40
  • +300

    by LoreParmenter
    on 2024-02-15 01:10
  • +300

    by SurrenStarr
    on 2024-02-14 08:23
  • +100

    by Snoopdigglet
    on 2024-02-13 23:40
    As long as blocking someone doesn't prevent them from viewing content, this should just prevent direct forms of contact.   Preventing someone's ability to interact with otherwise public pages because of personal grievances/ideological differences is somewhat of a "you problem".
  • +100

    by WitchyWoman128
    on 2024-02-13 14:06
  • +300

    by bphilippe
    on 2024-02-13 01:58
  • +300

    by Watchman Deedly
    on 2024-02-13 00:30
    I would also like to add that it would also be useful to be able to remove or block problematic users from the Author's Page as well. The above post makes a valid point. While this has been an enjoyable community, there are some folks who do not work and play well others. Ain't nobody got time for that. On all social medial platforms it is best to block users and move on without causing much of a ruckus, or relying on a slow administrative process, which may not solve anything at all. Giving us a block user option provides us with another tool to prevent unsavory characters from bothering users who just want to be here to create and have a good time.
  • +300

    by kerahope
    on 2024-02-12 23:40
  • +100

    by DonarRaven
    on 2024-02-12 20:10
  • +300

    by eldknighterrant
    on 2024-02-12 19:55
    Absolutely. As nice as the core(?) community is here, we can't run on the assumption that a platform of this size is immune to nasty behaviors from bad actors. Creatives can also become petty out of insecurity, as I'm sure we've all seen before.
  • +300

    by Warnord
    on 2024-02-12 17:08
  • +300

    by Everwild
    on 2024-02-12 13:49
    This is a must. We shouldn't even have to vote on it. The inability to moderate our own content by removing or blocking toxic or dangerous personalities has already chased away more than one person I've met while on World Anvil. I appreciate all the developers do here, for all of us, but something like this should have been implemented from the start. It's a paid service and we should be able to protect ourselves and our followers from the bad or predatory behaviors of others.
  • +300

    by JR Kenja
    on 2024-02-11 16:35
  • +100

    by yanklbonkl
    on 2024-02-11 16:30
  • +300

    by Chrysochus
    on 2024-02-11 13:22
  • +1

    by LittleSister
    on 2024-02-11 03:26
  • +300

    by beebidon
    on 2024-02-11 02:00
    This feels like a no-brainer for any website that allows interaction in 2024.
  • +300

    by TinkerTech
    on 2024-02-11 00:42
    I've seen communities that, while great, have poor moderation/management tools and leave lot of people with trouble ridding themselves of individuals they would rather not have contact with. I third Hanhula's suggestion of the block/unfollow not showing up on the 'blocked' person's end, allowing the illusion that they still have agency while putting up a virtual 'barrier' between people.
  • +300

    by A Glamorous Goblin
    on 2024-02-10 19:21
    Can't believe this isn't a thing already.
  • +300

    by Scrolls Terminal
    on 2024-02-10 00:23
    100% need the ability to relocate trolls and squash chuds.
  • +300

    by A Rambunctious Ooze
    on 2024-02-09 18:13
  • -300

    by A Thundering Dwarf
    on 2024-02-09 15:09
  • +300

    by kaixabu
    on 2024-02-09 11:56
    Very timely for me. I have a weird troll (1 of only 2 followers, lol) and I really wish I could drop it off before I do start sending notifications.
  • +300

    by tofistig
    on 2024-02-09 09:12
    This is an incredibly important feature, that I would love to see implemented.
  • +300

    by orphidor
    on 2024-02-09 06:43
  • +300

    by Drawkill Dragon
    on 2024-02-09 03:35
  • +300

    by A Enfeebled Orc
    on 2024-02-08 17:54
  • -300

    by A Lusty T-Rex
    on 2024-02-08 16:44
  • +300

    by DramaticDragons
    on 2024-02-08 16:15
  • +300

    by MKHETH II
    on 2024-02-08 15:18
  • +1

    by OK_Diamond
    on 2024-02-08 14:48
  • +300

    by Kittymonster
    on 2024-02-08 13:50
  • +300

    by nasandre
    on 2024-02-08 11:29
  • +300

    by AP.
    on 2024-02-08 10:33
  • +300

    by Midvinterdraken
    on 2024-02-08 07:37
    Yes, please! Had a breakaway with two players and it always stings to see their follow in my world remaining.
  • +300

    by spooktacular
    on 2024-02-08 04:00
    Would definitely be good. World Anvil seems to be moving forward in a more social-interaction approach which is great, but conflict is inevitable and blocking is an important safety feature.
  • +300

    by BasicDragon
    on 2024-02-08 03:21
  • +300

    by zpires
    on 2024-02-08 01:28
  • +300

    by Tower of Hana
    on 2024-02-07 22:35
  • +300

    by oaster2000
    on 2024-02-07 22:18
  • +300

    by Dxman2001
    on 2024-02-07 21:56
  • +300

    by Kros!
    on 2024-02-07 21:29
  • +300

    by A Mischievous Dryad
    on 2024-02-07 21:27
  • +300

    by Those2Nerds
    on 2024-02-07 21:10
  • +300

    by Angantyr
    on 2024-02-07 20:59
    This feels like a thing similar to Subscriber groups. I wonder how it looks on back-end and how easily it can be implemented.   People having more choice over who they interact with would definitely help creating a peaceful space/community, which is why I think this would greatly benefit the creators.
  • +300

    by Dhelian
    on 2024-02-07 20:07
  • +300

    by Serukis
    on 2024-02-07 19:41
  • +300

    by Alishahr
    on 2024-02-07 19:31
    I would love to see something like this in place, and also in support of Hanhula and Vazdimet's suggestions.
  • +300

    by Leashea
    on 2024-02-07 19:11
  • +300

    by nnie
    on 2024-02-07 19:06
    Tools like this are important to keep everyone safe. Sometimes it's just a personality crash that's best to avoid, and other times it's necessary to protect yourself until the administration can handle things. I would really really like to see this implemented ASAP
  • +300

    by JoellaKay
    on 2024-02-07 18:58
    I think this goes along with the goal of moving more social interaction to the World Anvil site itself. I suspect it's quite a bit of development work, but I think it's important to put in that effort.
  • +300

    by strixxline
    on 2024-02-07 18:37
    100% support. The more we move towards being a social-forward platform, the more I'm seeing myself and other friends having really uncomfortable (but not actionable) interactions with other users on the site itself. Such is the nature of social media and large-scale communities, so adopting more of the usual ways to mitigate this would be excellent.
  • +300

    by Ademal
    on 2024-02-07 18:34
  • +300

    by Vazdimet
    on 2024-02-07 18:29
    The act of writing bares the soul in some ways, and it's easiest to share those writings when one feels safe.   World Anvil has a lovely, uplifting community, but even WA would benefit from more user controls such as blocking and removing followers. Especially as the site grows, and attracts more people.   It's always best to have these features in place before they are absolutely needed, and right now the only options for a world owner are to go private or disable community features entirely - which are both rather drastic options. This would allow an option in the middle.   (Also, please include user profile comments and follows in this, not just worlds themselves.)
  • +300

    by tjtrewin
    on 2024-02-07 18:24
    Yes. Please please please add a block function - I do not want to see or receive any form of interactions from a user who has been harassing me.   Furthermore, I do not want to see their interactions in the community. If I've blocked someone, I don't want to be able to see their global notifications/posts, or see their comments on other peoples profiles or worlds either.   I am very grateful for the recent addition of the report button, but prevention of further interactions is a necessary safety tool for the community :)   I am also in favour of Hanhula's suggestion so that blocked individuals do not try to circumvent the measure, either on WA or by trying to interact through other platforms.
  • +300

    by Mochimanoban
    on 2024-02-07 18:10
  • +300

    by Hanhula
    on 2024-02-07 18:09
    I'd especially like it if the user in question wasn't alerted to the block - their like would send no notification & not affect the article's actual likes, but would still show as being liked on their end.
  • +300

    by Jacob-W
    on 2024-02-07 18:06
  • +300

    by notahumanhand
    on 2024-02-07 18:03