accepted
culture ethnicity food intoxicant cultural ethnic new-article article
What functionality is missing? What is unsatisfying with the current situation?
ETHNICITY and CULTURE are wildly different things that only partially overlap, and the current ETHNICITY doesn't do either as well as it could.
i.e.
Quebecois culture is totally distinct from Canadian culture and is constituted by several ethnicities.
There are several distinct cultures within China or Japan, but in the case of both nations, these cultures exist within a relatively ethnically uniform population.
Not only that, but the current fields in ETHNICITY, don't describe ethnic distinctions, they are purely CULTURAL anyway. ETHNICITY is essentially a biological classification, or a distinction of lineage or genetics. Even if you use a more expansive definition of ETHNICITY to include some cultural elements, the current ETHNICITY article contains only CULTURAL elements, and no sections regarding the more core ethnic traits like biology, lineage, morphological distinctions, etc.
The ETHNICITY article is already essentially a mislabelled CULTURE article ... so let's fix that labelling and make it a more robust and thorough CULTURE article.
At the very least I would like to rename it "CULTURE/ETHNICITY", but ideally just be renamed CULTURE, and then treated as such. This would be partially a title/name change, but also include the addition of new tabs, sections and related links to create a more robust article.
I am aware that I am proposing a potentially large and expansive article, but culture is SO important, especially when world building, that I believe it could even be seen as a central "spine" to a new world. Culture is complex and connects to everything in a world or a characters life or a story, so having a (potentially) large complex article for it seems appropriate.
Here are my proposed additions/changes:
new tab/section: "Social Structures"
Customary codes & shared values (moved from existing "Customs")
Social hierarchies
symbols
Morality and social punishments
view of others/outsiders
new tab/section: "Day to day life"
Food and Drink
Intoxicants
Entertainment
Clothing and Fashion (replacing "dress code" from existing "Customs")
Common Etiquette (moved from existing "Customs")
Add "Political Ideals" to the existing "Ideals" tab/section.
Add "Religion and Spirituality" to the existing "Customs" tab/section.
How does this feature request address the current situation?
It gives us an article to describe cultures far more thoroughly than they can be currently (without just lots of rambling in the general prose section).
What are other uses for this feature request?
For those trying to describe an incidental culture, or give context to a single "outsider" character, a more fleshed out CULTURE article framework could give a DM or author a place to describe all the high level information they would need quickly and in an organised fashion. Instead of having to create dozens of articles on separate elements, they could all be described quickly in a single place that was easy to create and quick to review.
Simultaneously, for someone crafting a massive and detailed culture at the heart of a story or campaign, this highly detailed and robust framework could be the "launch page" that connects and knits together all the dozens of other articles, timelines, and maps together.
I like to be efficient and minimalist where possible ... but I think in this case: more is more! :)
Follow up
illumiinae ... you echo my thoughts exactly ... how one group feels and thinks about "outsiders", or even how they define what is "other", is hugely important and can provide a lot of interesting nuance to the culture itself.
@Scalenex ... I'm curious why you think changing the name is a bad idea?
@AuraGuard ... I totally get what you mean. I completely agree that Ethnicity needs to exist, it's part of why I suggested just adding to, rather than replacing, but part of my central point is that the current article doesn't actually describe ETHNICITY per se ... but it's murky ... it's why I tried to present options ... I'm trying as best I can to put myself in the mindset of the developers as well as users ... in my perfect world I would have renamed ETHNICITY as CULTURE, added all the fields I suggested, then made a totally new article type called ETHNICITY that just has biological and superficial sections, or maybe made it a single tab of the SPECIES article ... but that's a lot of organisational rework, overhead, and effects probably thousands of already existing articles.
Another thought I had after I submitted this suggestion, was having ETHNICITY as it's own tab within CULTURE/ETHNICITY, where you could have all the biological, lineage, superficial stuff.
Anyway! It's a bit complicated and probably has a myriad of unseen connections and potential implications on the back-end as well ... all we can do is make the most constructive suggestions we can, hope enough people see the merit, and then extra hope they can be implemented lol
J B Dorman ... in a perfect world I totally agree with you! ... I'd love to just see the addition of a massive CULTURE article that sort of acts as the "spine" or "hub" for world building, since world building is usually actually "culture building" with extra context lol ... BUT!!! I have tried running a startup before, and while I don't know how much work it would be, I can imagine it's quite a bit lol ... so I'm trying to sell a sort of compromise that will get us a more robust CULTURE article, but also be something that is not so massive a development effort that it's relatively "low cost" to implement.
@Verikus and MasterWheezy ... thanks :)
@Scyoni ... I thought about a "subcultures" dropdown list as well, but when I started thinking of real and fictional examples, they were so numerous and so varied, I think it would be too contextual and vast to create a practical discoverable list. Even trying to categorise sub-cultures seemed too complex and contextual .... BUT! Assuming that CULTURE doesn't get it's own new article type , what would be cool is a dropdown list that allowed you to mark the article as specifically either "ETHNICITY" or "CULTURE" or "SUB-CULTURE"!
Hanhula ... I see your point, and I'm aware there's a chance this could be a huge hastle, but to be blunt, I'm not going to limit my ideas and suggestions based on what is easy, but on what I think is good/useful/impactful ... if Dimitris wants to refuse the idea on the grounds that he's trying to run a tech company and it's just not worth the resource allocation, I 110% respect that, but I'll leave that decision up to him, and request the concepts I think are needed with that in mind. All that said, I still tried to structure this request in a way that MIGHT be a bit easier to impliment, because I try to be realist .... BUT ... honestly ... based on the feedback I've been getting here and on discord since I made the suggestion, the more I think the best solution, and probably the most popular, is to just create a whole new article type explicitly for CULTURE.
A Fierce Hobbit ... While I respect a healthy degree of pedantry, I don't believe your arguments are entirely convincing or valid to address my concerns. I concede that the modern academic/technical definition of "ethnicity" is often vague, I also think that said definition is one honoured more in the breach than in the observance. Not only that, but even if we DO use your definition and examples of ETHNICITY ... it still doesn't address my problem. Trying to further muddy the waters by introducing ethnic and social culture will make things worse. ... ultimately, I did not make my suggestion from an academic perspective, but rather from a PRACTICAL one. By any common practical definition, ETHNICITY and CULTURE are separate concepts and most importantly, wildly different world building structures. ... I have ETHNICITIES and CULTURES and SPECIES that are all separate and unique from one another, nested within, and overlapping one another, just like real life ... the whole human species can no more have a culture than a loaf of bread can have seeding and growing instructions for example ... anyway ... I'm getting off on a rant ... I am not saying ETHNICITY is useless, or even that you're pedagogically incorrect ... far from it! I'm saying that at present there is no CULTURE article and we badly need one, and I would hasten to point out that based on the overwhelming support and incredibly low downvotes on this suggestion, the broader WA community would agree with me. ..... CULTURE is it's own concept, structure, and cognitive category, very different and separate from species, race, ethnicity or family ... whether it's added as a "slash" to ETHNICITY or as it's own unique article ... we need a CULTURE article.
The Team's Response
Partially Accepted
There are some very good suggestions for new prompts that we can explore and create a plan for. This will definitely be discussed in the community Discord.
The template will not be renamed
Current score
141/300 Votes · +27913 points