Follow up

• +300

  by Coloratuba
  on 2024-03-19 18:23

• +300

  by momococa
  on 2024-03-19 09:45

• +300

  by Ebsfive
  on 2024-03-18 15:31

• -300

  by mikawa
  on 2024-03-18 05:13

• +300

  by donpedicinijr
  on 2024-03-18 01:14

• +100

  by Alexej_Axis
  on 2024-03-17 07:43

• +300

  by ForagedBones
  on 2024-03-16 16:51

• -300

  by SoulLink
  on 2024-03-16 08:10

• +300

  by Ynkawen
  on 2024-03-16 01:43

• +300

  by Syogren
  on 2024-03-15 17:55

• +1

  by ExcelsiorV2
  on 2024-03-14 13:26

• +300

  by aryst0krat
  on 2024-03-14 08:31

• +300

  by gcjones216
  on 2024-03-14 00:11

• +300

  by AvalonArcana
  on 2024-03-12 21:03

• +300

  by A Filthy Bananafolk
  on 2024-03-12 17:46

• +100

  by Thadium
  on 2024-03-12 02:19

• +300

  by HouseMech
  on 2024-03-12 01:21

• +100

  by malinsquest
  on 2024-03-11 13:19

• +300

  by ptsdguts
  on 2024-03-11 11:34

• +300

  by BasicDragon
  on 2024-03-11 06:43

• +100

  by A Thundering Hobbit
  on 2024-03-11 05:38

• +300

  by leftofarcadia
  on 2024-03-10 10:49

• +300

  by Mahdi Avendesora
  on 2024-03-10 10:41

• +300

  by WorldbuildingJet
  on 2024-03-10 05:15

• +300

  by lkmorris
  on 2024-03-09 13:51

• +300

  by Those2Nerds
  on 2024-03-09 13:41

• +300

  by ZenithFireHaert
  on 2024-03-09 07:23

• +300

  by A Goodhearted Velociraptor
  on 2024-03-09 06:30

  It should 100% be opt in, and their current stance on AI has me debating on how to poison a text based dataset. Maybe some kind of text encoding?

• +300

  by Hanhula
  on 2024-03-09 06:28

  Yeah, please. This is my favourite solution on AO3 and I'd like it to be here, too.

• +1

  by Milobunbun
  on 2024-03-08 03:50

  I actually find it really concerning that worldanvil is not more keen to protect its users from having their work stolen. I did private my work but that also means my work cannot participate in the community aspect anymore. If I had more coins I would spend more here.

• +100

  by celex
  on 2024-03-07 22:05

• +300

  by miraiya
  on 2024-03-07 18:54

• +100

  by DoStuffZ
  on 2024-03-07 15:07

• +300

  by GM S'drolion
  on 2024-03-07 15:05

• +1

  by Observer of the Stars
  on 2024-03-07 02:02

• +300

  by Lenosallose
  on 2024-03-06 19:20

• +300

  by Gunner1994
  on 2024-03-06 15:46

• +300

  by A Adorable Velociraptor
  on 2024-03-06 14:22

• +1

  by romainhdl
  on 2024-03-06 13:13

  This is an excellent idea for privacy’s sake, a way to send viewable link would also be appreciated (akin to google doc feature)

• +300

  by Catoblepon
  on 2024-03-06 11:55

• +300

  by Akh
  on 2024-03-06 11:13

• +300

  by Fearandramen
  on 2024-03-05 18:01

• +300

  by BetweenTime
  on 2024-03-05 04:02

• +100

  by Xaenis
  on 2024-03-05 03:00

• +300

  by Grogus The Mad
  on 2024-03-05 01:47

• +300

  by Bluboram
  on 2024-03-04 21:18

• +100

  by JetpackMonkey
  on 2024-03-04 15:44

• +300

  by Almenu
  on 2024-03-04 15:35

• +300

  by Rhioppe
  on 2024-03-04 07:40

• +300

  by Kranjax
  on 2024-03-03 07:20

• +1

  by SebGreg732
  on 2024-03-03 00:44

• +300

  by GrayWarden
  on 2024-03-02 22:14

• +1

  by imly2k
  on 2024-03-02 12:50

• +300

  by DaisyChick
  on 2024-03-01 23:16

• +300

  by A Adorable Goblin
  on 2024-03-01 21:31

• +300

  by Amancham
  on 2024-03-01 11:27

  More privacy options gets a big yes! For various reasons, I support this.

• +300

  by Krispy Demon
  on 2024-03-01 06:22

• +300

  by Goose80
  on 2024-03-01 01:03

• +100

  by AsterVela
  on 2024-02-29 23:02

• +100

  by [email protected]
  on 2024-02-29 20:38

• +300

  by IdleMonochrome
  on 2024-02-29 17:32

• +100

  by Michael Chandra
  on 2024-02-29 16:48

  I'd like both a way to tag my world as 'don't crawl if AI please', and a way to go 'okay for this entire world, you must be logged in to read'. I can do it per article probably with a userstate-container, but that is limited in who can use it.

• +1

  by Masha Medov
  on 2024-02-29 09:59

• +1

  by shay the fae
  on 2024-02-29 02:28

• +300

  by A Frightened Goblin
  on 2024-02-28 21:29

  I strongly support more privacy options.

• +300

  by A Lusty Kitten
  on 2024-02-28 18:25

• +300

  by Hogshead
  on 2024-02-28 16:45

• +1

  by Blossom Tree Art
  on 2024-02-28 12:44

  I disagree with the reasoning about AI bots, but see no problem with the suggestion of limiting articles to only being viewed by World Anvil users. Feels like that should definitely be opt-in however, and not the default.

• +300

  by Jacob-W
  on 2024-02-28 08:37

• +300

  by Gregorian
  on 2024-02-27 23:50

• +300

  by Decaf Gaming
  on 2024-02-27 22:48

• +300

  by Sozo
  on 2024-02-27 22:00

• +300

  by A Glamorous T-Rex
  on 2024-02-27 08:02

• +300

  by amelianite
  on 2024-02-27 04:39

• +300

  by PrincessESH
  on 2024-02-26 22:27

  Yes. Yes. Yes. I was devastated when WA decided to just turn a blind eye to AI crawling. I really don't like the "all-or-nothing" stance that they've taken. The worry that an AI will snatch my work looms in my mind every time I publish an article. I dislike how WA's lack of privacy functions make me feel so powerless to protect my own content. Thank you for being bold in speaking.

• +300

  by PhntmDrgn
  on 2024-02-26 20:38

• +100

  by Adcheryl
  on 2024-02-26 10:07

• +300

  by Ricowitz
  on 2024-02-26 07:30

• +300

  by HunterChristmas1247
  on 2024-02-26 04:30

• +100

  by graiffe
  on 2024-02-25 21:11

  I agree with all of this, and more privacy options is great for those who are starting out and don't feel comfortable with the entire internet watching them.

• +300

  by Kittymonster
  on 2024-02-25 12:44

• +300

  by Pete Nelson
  on 2024-02-25 08:48

• +300

  by devinsxdesigns
  on 2024-02-25 02:25

  While I think the opening of this request was unnecessarily hostile, I do think the suggested feature has many uses. I agree with a below commenter on the usefulness of a feature like this to proceed to lock down accounts to those who are declared or verified 18+ and logged in, which would be nice.

• +300

  by DramaticDragons
  on 2024-02-24 17:40

• +300

  by Rayna Fairbell
  on 2024-02-24 16:40

• +300

  by AlexHarlequin
  on 2024-02-24 16:25

• +300

  by Chrispy_0
  on 2024-02-24 16:05

  If your work is good enough to copy or steal, then the people running these AI skimmers will find a way (by simply creating a WA account), making this feature pointless.   That said, I fully support the suggestion of restricting access on a per article or per world basis to WA users only, but for other reasons.

• +300

  by Mochimanoban
  on 2024-02-24 15:29

• +300

  by tjtrewin
  on 2024-02-24 15:13

• +100

  by A Wild Mimic
  on 2024-02-24 13:01

• +300

  by praefectus
  on 2024-02-24 11:29

• +300

  by spooktacular
  on 2024-02-24 05:34

• +300

  by Sirjwinsalot
  on 2024-02-24 01:43

• +300

  by A Mischievous Ooze
  on 2024-02-24 01:34

• +300

  by MKHETH II
  on 2024-02-24 00:35

• +300

  by PrincessHoneytea
  on 2024-02-23 23:34

• +100

  by Ratha
  on 2024-02-23 20:04

• +100

  by Haleo
  on 2024-02-23 20:01

• +1

  by BCGR_Wurth
  on 2024-02-23 19:56

• +300

  by JoellaKay
  on 2024-02-23 16:41

• +300

  by Tillerz
  on 2024-02-23 16:35

  I support this request. It can also help people to deflect aggression from artists who actively hate all kind of AI art. People can just set their world "private to WA users" and then the "public" is locked out.

• +300

  by zpires
  on 2024-02-23 15:57

• +300

  by kaixabu
  on 2024-02-23 14:56

  I was about to add in an 18+ feature similar to this.. so maybe combine "Authenticated" and "Authenticated 18+". Either way I will wait to submit mine based on how this one goes.

• +1

  by JackLink916
  on 2024-02-23 12:13

• +300

  by DiscardedStatue
  on 2024-02-23 11:19

• +100

  by WeStanNikolai
  on 2024-02-23 11:14

• +300

  by Cyborg Starfish
  on 2024-02-23 11:02