Follow up

• -1

  by J B Dorman
  on 2022-06-28 10:13

• +300

  by The Rival
  on 2022-06-27 15:17

• -300

  by Bluboram
  on 2022-06-26 17:34

• -300

  by A Goodhearted Elf
  on 2022-06-25 19:58

• +100

  by A Adorable Goblin
  on 2022-06-25 01:46

• -300

  by DarthGaymer
  on 2022-06-24 19:03

  The amount of effort to create in even a very simplisitic form would be far too much

• +1

  by AuraGuard
  on 2022-06-24 05:47

• +300

  by amelianite
  on 2022-06-22 08:29

• +300

  by Blacksteell
  on 2022-06-21 17:39

• -1

  by arty
  on 2022-06-21 17:05

  I believe that already has been implemented and is called a "friend"

• -100

  by AvalonArcana
  on 2022-06-20 20:10

• -300

  by tophertalks
  on 2022-06-20 19:22

• -300

  by A Enfeebled Orc
  on 2022-06-20 00:23

• -100

  by TheTinyTyro
  on 2022-06-19 23:23

• -300

  by A Mischievous Devil
  on 2022-06-19 11:08

• -300

  by LaughingProphet
  on 2022-06-18 04:10

• -300

  by Exarx
  on 2022-06-15 12:26

• -1

  by Kaleidechse
  on 2022-06-14 08:33

  Current AIs are highly specialized and require lots of data just to learn their one single task. Said data needs to be labeled by humans before the AI can learn anything from it. An AI can't just "read your articles" because it wouldn't know what to look for in the first place. Especially not if it's supposed to work with any world in any genre and by any author.   Either way, you as the author would spend an awful lot of time training your particular AI for your specific world. At this point you're probably better off with manually coded rules.   I recommend checking out the generator feature instead: Generators - Reference Manual

• -1

  by Adcheryl
  on 2022-06-14 04:39

• -300

  by Cryssalia
  on 2022-06-14 02:08

• -1

  by AlmostOrdinary
  on 2022-06-13 21:36

• -300

  by Ratha
  on 2022-06-13 17:45

• -300

  by Frogdrake
  on 2022-06-13 17:31

• -300

  by Dungeon_builder14
  on 2022-06-13 17:30

  Yeah, no. This is neither feasible for the WA team, nor would it even be worthwhile. I know almost nothing about programming, but even I know that making this would be nigh-impossible.

• -300

  by CrazyEddie
  on 2022-06-13 17:15

• -1

  by Mochimanoban
  on 2022-06-13 17:13

• -1

  by KajetanWrites
  on 2022-06-13 17:09

• -1

  by Rayna Fairbell
  on 2022-06-13 08:14

  Not sure if this is trollbait or legit lol

• -100

  by Jingletail
  on 2022-06-12 21:43

• -1

  by tjtrewin
  on 2022-06-12 18:15

• -1

  by nahogg
  on 2022-06-12 16:39

• -300

  by A Beloved Hobbit
  on 2022-06-12 09:39

• +1

  by Lima141
  on 2022-06-12 09:29

• -100

  by Hanhula
  on 2022-06-12 06:03

  Having implemented this sort of tech for larger organisations - hahahah absolutely not, we're nowhere near being able to have this level of complexity be worth the development time.

• +300

  by Ben Mobley
  on 2022-06-11 21:33

• -300

  by A Revolutionary Dimensional Horror
  on 2022-06-11 20:49

  This sounds a bit like a privacy hazard, especially if you have it read everything you have ever written in your world.

• -1

  by LaneysCastle
  on 2022-06-11 20:05

• -300

  by illumiinae
  on 2022-06-11 19:34

• -1

  by A Goodhearted T-Rex
  on 2022-06-11 19:19

  Let's revive this thread in 3500

• -300

  by A Enfeebled Dryad
  on 2022-06-11 17:37

  What kind of drugs are you on? hahahahahahahha

• +1

  by SpecterN7
  on 2022-06-11 17:15

  A cool idea, but I don't really need it.

• +1

  by UnknownWriter88
  on 2022-06-11 15:51

  This seems like a HUGE, complex task for the WA team. While it would be nice, I don't see this happening anytime soon, if at all.

• -300

  by A Rambunctious Skeleton
  on 2022-06-11 15:39

• +300

  by Sach2000
  on 2022-06-11 15:07

• +300

  by Frejth King
  on 2022-06-11 14:51