Currently, categories and articles can both be restricted to specific subscriber groups, but the permissions must be configured separately for each article.
Managing dozens or hundreds of articles requires repetitive configuration, and it is easy to accidentally forget to apply the correct permissions to an article.
I propose adding an optional setting that allows articles to inherit the subscriber group permissions from the category they are in.
This would:
Upvoting because we could use bulk editing for articles. However! Permission inheritance can make it harder to track who has permission to what, harder to have exceptions to the rule, harder to organize, and can overall be a confusing mess. Does enabling inheritance override the permissions on the articles themselves? What about sub-categories and those articles? What happens when you disable inheritance, are inherited permissions removed or are they added explicitly? What about when you move articles or sub-categories around? If you forget which categories have which permissions, you could inadvertently lock people out of an article or give access to the wrong group. Bulk permission changes would be a simpler and more flexible solution than inheritance. Maybe a way to copy permissions from one category/article to a selection of others, or to apply category permissions to all currently-contained articles without setting an ongoing precedent or enforcement rule. Signed, someone who works in access management.
Ooh, I love this idea. It would be great to be able to more easily track and make changes to the visibility of entire groups of articles instead of dredging through one at a time.