Multi-Tag [Tagged] Capability
Remove these ads. Join the Worldbuilders Guild
Multi-Tag [Tagged] Capability
Feature Upgrade · Api · Created by BARON229
closed
BBCode Tags Tagged Links Articles Tagged-articles
An upgrade to the [tagged] BBCode is in order, specifically an optional additional data entry for multiple tags! If I want to list all articles relating to one character, the [tagged] code works fine, but what if I want only the articles that I've tagged with character A and character B? As of now, the only way would be to manually link it, or make a new tag on every relevant article that I think to find that contains A and B and make a new AB tag. Cutting out the middle-man, and the middle-men for a party of 3 or 4, would be a great benefit!
Follow up
As mentioned in the comments (shout out to PhntmDrgn), the optional data entires in mind would be boolean operators, probably the most simple ones like AND, OR, and NOT, with symbols to represent them like &, +, and ~ (respectively). This would be used to include and exclude particular tags by the symbols (or words, or both, however it needs to function), into something like this: The above would generate a list of articles with Character A and Character B, but not any with Character C or Character D. There's tons of flexibility with just those three operators!
Forgot the noparse above. [tagged:#characterA&characterB~#characterC~#characterD|list|A B no C D]
The Team's Response
Quite low support for a very complicated request that can be addressed by creating subsets. I am not saying it's a bad idea, it will need more support though to dive into something like this.
Current score
31/300 Votes · +6570 points
Votes Cast
-
+100
by Dungeon John
on 2022-03-01 22:13 -
+10
by ShadowCatJen
on 2022-03-01 04:00 -
+300
by Vynian Dreslard
on 2022-02-26 08:20 -
+300
by Lebardesolitaire
on 2022-02-26 07:31 -
+300
by Silviooooooo
on 2022-02-26 07:29 -
+300
-
+300
by Oneriwien
on 2022-02-23 09:01 -
+100
by PrincessESH
on 2022-02-23 01:46 -
+100
by Thadium
on 2022-02-21 18:25 -
+300
by M. A. E. Krawczyk
on 2022-02-20 07:57 -
+100
by Dedublio
on 2022-02-20 04:16 -
+300
by Rayna Fairbell
on 2022-02-19 18:42 -
+10
by scholarmage
on 2022-02-17 15:05 -
+300
by denversg1
on 2022-02-17 09:49 -
+300
by Void_Epiphany
on 2022-02-17 02:40 -
+200
by morganarcher
on 2022-02-17 02:28 -
+200
by Careen Ligh
on 2022-02-16 20:10 -
+300
by Uruschk
on 2022-02-16 19:29 -
+300
by PhntmDrgn
on 2022-02-16 05:33While it would be difficult to program all boolean operators for the search option, would it be feasible to start with just the AND operator. This would provide a huge functionality boost without requiring complex expression parsing.
-
+50
by david12king
on 2022-02-16 01:26 -
+300
by Happypill
on 2022-02-15 21:01 -
+300
by Rahjar
on 2022-02-15 19:51 -
+50
by yatenari
on 2022-02-15 19:10 -
+300
-
+300
by wolfoflight2003
on 2022-02-15 17:37 -
+300
by Satrium
on 2022-02-15 16:12 -
+100
by FictionFan1995
on 2022-02-15 15:29 -
+50
by Michael Chandra
on 2022-02-15 15:19 -
+50
by Fizzycyst
on 2022-02-15 13:46 -
+300
by Kaleidechse
on 2022-02-15 13:28 -
+50
by AuraGuard
on 2022-02-15 13:18 -
+300
by BARON229
on 2022-02-15 12:06
Find your way!
Resources
WHO WE ARE
LEGAL
Get the news
Listen to our Podcast
Our Allies
by 3 Armored Kittens · Prodromos v.1.1 - World Anvil 0.9.15.009 © 2017-2024 [en] | Anvil Time: 01:46, May 6 2024