Difference between specific and general for articles | World Anvil

Remove these ads. Join the Worldbuilders Guild

Difference between specific and general for articles

Feature Upgrade · Articles & templates · Created by Wingshaw
declined
What functionality is missing?
Many article templates are currently designed to be used to describe both an individual object, as well as a class of object. For example, if I am writing about a specific vehicle belonging to my characters (say, the LZ 129 Hindenburg) there is a prompt in which I can specify what class of vehicle it is (Hindenburg-class airship). However the linked class article is the exact same template as the individual vehicle template.

It stands to reason that a different set of prompts are required to describe a class of vehicle from the specific vehicle. A specific vehicle has a date of construction, a manufacturer, an owner, a date of destruction, and so forth. A class of vehicle has different properties, such as inventor, patent, propulsion.

This same issue exists with other article templates: buildings (perhaps I want to describe a particular fortification, or maybe I want to describe a type of fortification belonging to X culture), items (a specific necklace, or a type of necklace), settlements, etc.

The suggestion
The suggestion is simple but not easy: separate article templates into both a definite and indefinite form, and offer separate prompts for each.

How does this feature request address the current situation?
Having article templates separated into definite/indefinite will streamline the creation of articles by allowing users to only consider the prompts that are relevant to that article. By having an indefinite category (the class of vehicle/building/item etc.), the user can describe all the vehicles of that type more easily, without having to include it in each individual article.

Caveat
I know that this suggestion is quite a big change, and would involve a lot of work. I therefore expect it might generate some discussion. I also know that there has been a similar suggestion made previously and declined (https://www.worldanvil.com/community/voting/suggestion/ea492fc9-e434-4be4-ae66-1a9c19b13a57/view). I do believe, however, that my suggestion gives this a more concrete direction to follow.

The Team's Response

This suggestion did not reach the required number of votes during its voting period   This will lead to a massive number of templates for little to no gain that will make it harder to navigate and find what you want. In addition this would have made article connectivity a nightmare to manage.
Current score

44/300 Votes · +5400 points

Votes Cast

  • +300

    by starfro67
    on 2021-07-09 00:09
  • +10

    by Evi105
    on 2021-07-08 18:49
  • +300

    by Shonuff
    on 2021-07-08 00:34
  • +50

    by RTralidas
    on 2021-07-06 14:51
  • +100

    by Vulthuryol
    on 2021-07-05 17:15
  • +10

    by zarazandra
    on 2021-07-05 14:23
  • +100

    by kylocore
    on 2021-07-05 00:19
  • +50

    by Pookas Kreations
    on 2021-07-04 16:42
  • +300

    by Herasoul3
    on 2021-07-04 03:42
  • +100

    by Redcollarwolf
    on 2021-07-04 01:27
  • +300

    by ChroniclesofEvalaw
    on 2021-07-02 17:12
  • +200

    by Orion3
    on 2021-07-02 13:45
  • +100

    by The Talespinner
    on 2021-06-29 14:47
  • +10

    by Verdux Xudrev
    on 2021-06-29 04:33
  • +10

    by Op1999
    on 2021-06-28 17:15
  • +10

    by DarkhorseMB
    on 2021-06-28 17:05
  • +100

    by PrincessESH
    on 2021-06-25 17:47
    I agree with T_WA. Rather than having entirely new templates, I think that adding a new tab to the existing templates would be the best bet.
  • +50

    by raptorbricks
    on 2021-06-25 12:42
  • +300

    by agro
    on 2021-06-25 10:12
  • +300

    by Carl-Heinz Langley
    on 2021-06-25 05:42
  • +100

    by A Enfeebled Velociraptor
    on 2021-06-24 08:28
  • +200

    by noot da noot
    on 2021-06-23 16:18
  • -10

    by ka_jan
    on 2021-06-23 12:44
  • +300

    by T_WA
    on 2021-06-23 06:48
    I see the point, though I think a different solution might be more appropriate: instead of having separate templates entirely - which would lead to way too many templates, to be honest -, I think it would be more productive to just implement different categories of prompts in each template, these categories being first specific prompts then general prompts. As prompts already are divided in different tabs, I think this shouldn't prove to be an issue, even if it is still possibly quite some work to implement the prompts.
  • +20

    by Zarvinn
    on 2021-06-22 14:36
  • +300

    by AJ Smith
    on 2021-06-22 12:55
  • +50

    by RatTaster
    on 2021-06-22 03:07
  • +20

    by LoneGirl88
    on 2021-06-21 13:27
  • +100

    by Rashkavar
    on 2021-06-21 04:18
  • +200

    by GingerBread125
    on 2021-06-21 04:00
  • +300

    by arlj11
    on 2021-06-21 03:34
    Adding a definite/indefinite functionality would be a great help when it comes to the multitude of fields some templates have.
  • +300

    by Valasania
    on 2021-06-20 16:44
    Oh, that's actually my old article linked. How lovely lol. I greatly support this kind of suggestion - this one is much better articulated than mine, and explains the challenges associated with it quite well. For my part I think that the payoff would be worth it if it improves the overall quality of the article system.
  • -50

    by A Fluffy Dimensional Horror
    on 2021-06-20 16:26
  • +300

    by Rahjar
    on 2021-06-20 13:28
  • +10

    by Lenosallose
    on 2021-06-20 13:02
  • -300

    by Michael Chandra
    on 2021-06-20 08:21
    I think this would be a horrible clutter of categories, and would really mess with articles that have prompts linking to other articles. Now if you said 'split the prompts into 3 types, definite/indefinite/both, and let me toggle which ones to show', that'd be an entirely different story. But the way you're suggesting this, would require a massive overhaul which does not seem worth it to me.
  • +300

    by Raven Gladstone
    on 2021-06-20 02:35
  • +10

    by Wingedcat13
    on 2021-06-19 18:34
  • +10

    by KajetanWrites
    on 2021-06-19 18:13
  • +50

    by trainhighway
    on 2021-06-19 13:30
  • +20

    by i666psyco
    on 2021-06-19 10:08
  • +50

    by NatB5989
    on 2021-06-19 09:19
  • +100

    by tophertalks
    on 2021-06-19 08:55
  • +20

    by MarkusD
    on 2021-06-19 08:08
  • +300

    by Wingshaw
    on 2021-06-19 07:58