Tooltips and/or popups in manuscripts | World Anvil

Remove these ads. Join the Worldbuilders Guild

Tooltips and/or popups in manuscripts

New Feature Addition · Manuscripts · Created by VariableX
declined
The pop-ups and tooltips in articles are fantastic, and I'd love to be able to use them in the manuscripts too.  

What functionality is missing? What is unsatisfying with the current situation?

  As a reader, I'd rather be able to hover over something in a story to get a little more info about it than have to leave the story, go to the world, look up the topic, and then backtrack to the story and try to recapture the flow.   As a writer, I often mention details about my world off-hand. It would be great if I had a way to tell readers about that (and give them the option to go look up the whole article if they want to) without taking them off the page.  

How does this feature request address the current situation?

  Adding popups/tooltip options to a manuscript would keep readers on that page and add to their understanding of the world with minimal interruption to their engagement with the story.

Follow up


>DMFW said: "I'd be worried that if Manuscript options went too far away from things that can be presented in open formats, we'll get something that isn't exportable."   That's why I suggested that using this be optional. If someone wants to export an epub, they could simply avoid using it--or maybe there could be a button to hide the hover links or bypass them during the process (I have only basic coding skills, so I'm not sure how that would work), And in any case, I didn't think you sounded mean. :-)
--------------------------------- Re: Footnotes...I wonder if there might even be a way to allow the author to select whether they want to use popups or traditional footnotes? I would prefer popups for most things, but I can see how footnotes would be more appealing for some projects.

The Team's Response

Tooltips/links etc, will not be implemented into the document of a manuscript. Each part / chapter will be getting its own section that BBcode will be available in the future.
Current score

29/300 Votes · +5370 points

Votes Cast

  • +50

    by MDarkKing
    on 2022-03-22 18:02
  • +300

    by WolfofWinter
    on 2022-03-19 13:06
  • +20

    by A Roaring Dryad
    on 2022-03-18 02:14
  • +300

    by HyperionCaesar
    on 2022-03-18 01:49
  • -10

    by Scyoni
    on 2022-03-15 22:26
    Honestly a list of links similar to the ones we use in editing would be nice - just a "related topics" sidebar/footer box with a list of pages. I wouldn't want to display ALL related content links since the ones I keep for reference occasionally relate to spoilers, but it seems like an 'addon' that doesn't impact the exportability / format of the actual story if they're an aside.   Having them inline seems to me like it would be distracting and more complicated than its typically worth... Even footnotes lend themselves to feeling more like an encyclopaedia than a story. Small downvote because I think this should be taken in a 'related content' direction instead of adding layers to the writing itself.
  • +200

    by moonflower-writing
    on 2022-03-13 16:50
    This seems like a nice addition for explaining new concepts without breaking immersion
  • +10

    by Michael Chandra
    on 2022-03-13 15:32
    I like the more-immersive footnotes idea, which is also friendlier for a print format.
  • +300

    by JamesWoodwright
    on 2022-03-13 15:06
  • +300

    by Uruschk
    on 2022-03-11 16:27
  • +300

    by Arevlan
    on 2022-03-11 15:29
  • +300

    by Lenosallose
    on 2022-03-11 10:18
  • +200

    by Drake Ragon
    on 2022-03-10 08:11
    I pondered about that for a while too. I am still sure, that it would be a great addition for those who want to know more on the spot. Which is awesome for those readers, invested in your world.   Others might get tempted and therefore get pulled out of the story or simply overwhelmed. A "show/hide links" button could fix that and on top of that I am quite sure that the export to any format could simply ignore links and show them as normal text.   Footnotes could work, but this might also be a good idea for variables (which are not usable yet, I believe) this way one could explain a thing as short as possible and avoid the things mentioned above. Yet again that's technically a "in place" footnote :D
  • +300

    by A Mischievous Kobold
    on 2022-03-09 23:44
  • +50

    by Cammykins
    on 2022-03-09 21:21
    If instead of a tool tip or pop-up it was a footnote. Footnotes are often used in fiction as well as non-fiction. that way the reader could decide if they wanted to use it and it would stay in the book and be exportable and/or printable. I have seen this in EPUB books already. Terry Pratchet uses it all the time
  • +300

    by TheWaterLilyTora
    on 2022-03-09 12:37
  • +100

    by iantojohn
    on 2022-03-08 02:14
  • +50

    by Exaldear
    on 2022-03-08 00:30
    If it's an optional measure to be turned on and won't affect the eventual export of manuscripts then this idea could help those who want it.
  • +300

    by Dirkster
    on 2022-03-07 16:06
  • -300

    by DMFW
    on 2022-03-07 14:59
    So, I'm going to downvote this, because it goes against the spirit of open publishing which I think manuscripts are intended for. I'm not trying to be mean as I understand the impulse behind the idea but at some point I believe the generation of epubs from manuscripts is going to be a thing and then where do the tool tips go? Rich formatting options like this seem to belong more to content intended to be always presented on the main site, which isn't necessarily the idea with Manuscripts. I'd be worried that if Manuscript options went too far away from things that can be presented in open formats, we'll get something that isn't exportable. That said, there are some things you can't do in manuscripts that should be exportable so I'd like to see those included but that's a different topic.
  • +100

    by TheDoctor292
    on 2022-03-06 18:01
  • +300

    by LiaFelis
    on 2022-03-06 08:28
  • +100

    by SrSpaceCadet
    on 2022-03-06 03:36
  • +50

    by NovaTerra
    on 2022-03-05 22:55
  • +200

    by Tijmuhn
    on 2022-03-05 08:55
  • +300

    by A Fluffy T-Rex
    on 2022-03-04 15:16
  • +300

    by LeighThalion
    on 2022-03-04 15:14
    Oooh. Yes. This would be really nice. It'd be like having auto-footnotes or an index that you didn't have to leave your spot to go look up the thing. I don't know how many stories I've read where they explain the weird thing once and then don't bring it up again until thirty chapters later and I have to go back and hunt up the original passage. Being able to hover instead of go hunting would be sweet.
  • +300

    by A Adorable Skeleton
    on 2022-03-04 13:23
  • +300

    by eccbooks
    on 2022-03-04 11:46
  • +50

    by AuraGuard
    on 2022-03-04 11:14
  • +300

    by VariableX
    on 2022-03-04 06:44