Feature Upgrade · Organization charts · Created by
Menkheperrê
closed
diplomacy -web interaction diplomatic relation webs diplomacy-web diplomacy-webs organization-chart organizational-charts organizations organization-charts organization feature-upgrade relations interactions
What functionality is missing? What is unsatisfying with the current situation?
It could be really usefull to allow th diplomacy web to show the evolution of the relation between organizations. For a story or campaign where diplomatic interactions can change drastically over time, this could be useful.
I saw that you can add several diplomatic relations to an organization with the same counterpart. Maybe by being able to tag the diplomatic relation itself instead of the whole organization article, we could add multiple iterations of diplomacy web that show the evolution of the relations during campaings/stories/history, like #diplomacy-scenario01 ; #diplomacy-scenario02. When the relation doesn't change, add multiple tags of the different stages of the scenario would keep the relation in the next diplomacy web.
Maybe there could be another way to achieve this, but I've also been trying to figure out what might be the technically easiest approach to implementing such a system, with my limited knowledge of the functioning of the Anvil website.
How does this feature request address the current situation?
The diplomacy web is very usefull, but for now if we want to track changes of diplomatic relations, we need to make mutiple dummy copies of the same organization, which is a little bit clunky.
What are other uses for this feature request?
I suppose that with the good tag, it could also allow to create "secret" diplomatic relations. I really think that a tag based system would allow countless possibilities.
The Team's Response
That is a brilliant idea and it would be amazing to see an evolutionary relationships tree but
1. This has disproportionately very little support compared to the effort of making it happen (it will be a complete redesign of all the relationships system to become time-based (kind of going from 2D to 3D)
2. I think that even if we were going to do it - hardly anyone will use it due to the seer complexity of inputting the data in a matrix not only across multiple organizations but also through units of time. 10 organizations means 100 entries per unit of time, which means 1000 entries only for 10 "steps" of time.
I would love to do it but this will need a feature that clearly hits both lowest level thresholds.
Current score
37/300 Votes · +7204 points