What functionality is missing? What is unsatisfying with the current situation?
Currently, when creating a language for our worlds, we are able to create specific words for said language including: part of speech, pronunciation, translation and definition, examples of the word, root of the word, and etymology. However, translation and definition are both the same field.
How does this feature request address the current situation?
What this would change would be to give definition its own field.
The Team's Response
Not against it but there is very low support to implement it at this point
Current score
38/300 Votes · +5912 points