adding fields for slaves, pets, etc. to the "ethnicity" article | World Anvil

Remove these ads. Join the Worldbuilders Guild

adding fields for slaves, pets, etc. to the "ethnicity" article

Feature Upgrade · Articles & templates · Created by Logan Mountain
accepted
ethnicity species pet slave subordinate organization farm-animal

Feature Request:

I would like to add fields under the "connections & relations" tab of the "ethnicity" article. These would be a field to add article names that would then show up in the right hand information panel when viewed. These could be either several separate fields, or a couple of aggregate fields.

What functionality is missing? What is unsatisfying with the current situation?

There is currently no automated/prompted way of displaying the following within the "ethnicity" template:
1. animal species kept as pets by a culture
2. animal/plant species kept as domesticated food crops or beasts of burden
3. other sentient species or groups kept as slaves
 

How does this feature request address the current situation?

  • Adding a new field such as: "subordinate species" would encompass pets, domesticated animals, enslaved sentient species (droids, parshendi, etc) or even commonly farmed plants.
  • Adding a new field such as: "subordinate organisations/professions/ethnicities" would encompass slaves of the same species that belonged to a distinct ethnicity or legal group (ska, IRL Africans, etc)

  • Maybe there could be more granularity, like specifying pets from farm animals, a special field for plants instead of grouping them in, separating sentient from not sentient species, etc ... but I think the two groups above would probably include most potential options.  

    What are other uses for this feature request?

    I'm not sure? lol ... maybe you could also include something for individuals? Maybe there would be a use for noting when specific monsters, or noteworthy individual people who are "owned" or otherwise under the power of a given culture/ethnicity.

    Follow up


    @A Wild Bananafolk - I won't argue that slavery is perhaps an unpleasant subject, but it is also an incredibly common thing through all human history, and exists in various forms in lots modern of fantasy and sci-fi universes. That being said, I suggested the term "subordinate" rather than "slave" to be a bit more palatable, but also to create a broader umbrella term ... you could, for example, count the orcs in LOTR as slaves of Sauron, droids as slaves of humans, and the subject is even bluntly addressed with Harry Potter's house elves. Again, this is why I suggested the phrasing that I have :)
    @Dimitri ... I agree that ethnicities don't have slavery ... but cultures DO, and since you insist on not adding a culture article and trying to shoe-horn ethnicity into being culture, it's really the only place to put it. And as I say in the text, slavery is only one example of the concept I'm talking about: subordinate species and subordinate groups in general, pets and slaves are only 2 examples

    The Team's Response

  • Pets is a good idea
  • Slaves will not be added but we will discuss this, not because of the name and baggage associated with it but due to the fact it is inaccurate.
  • Slavery / Indenture service etc are not necessarily a matter of ethnicity but Organizations extending their power to their subjects. Ethnicities do have sociopolitical views that can of course extend into the worth of a life, castes etc but this is not a specific view.
    Current score

    55/300 Votes · +10305 points

    Votes Cast

    • +100

      by SebGreg732
      on 2022-10-04 11:26
    • +100

      by J B Dorman
      on 2022-10-04 10:48
    • +100

      by A Revolutionary Dragon
      on 2022-10-04 00:51
    • +300

      by Lirissa
      on 2022-10-03 23:30
    • +1

      by A Lusty Dimensional Horror
      on 2022-10-03 20:10
    • +300

      by Hegemon
      on 2022-10-03 14:23
    • +1

      by A Frightened Ooze
      on 2022-10-03 11:13
    • +100

      by Morekai
      on 2022-10-02 22:00
    • +100

      by LesMiserabby
      on 2022-10-02 21:03
    • +300

      by A Fierce Dimensional Horror
      on 2022-10-02 20:49
    • +100

      by $heckles
      on 2022-10-02 14:27
    • +300

      by Zurchonic
      on 2022-10-02 05:41
    • +300

      by A Sneaky Kitten
      on 2022-10-02 05:14
    • +300

      by GrassyHorizon
      on 2022-10-02 03:09
    • +1

      by Masha Medov
      on 2022-10-01 11:15
    • +300

      by BlackErathiah
      on 2022-09-29 17:37
    • +300

      by Bluboram
      on 2022-09-29 16:30
    • +300

      by Maltacrai
      on 2022-09-28 16:09
    • -1

      by Horseeatingacake
      on 2022-09-26 22:49
      Subordinate would probably be a better term.
    • +300

      by CM_Dunkin
      on 2022-09-26 18:41
    • +300

      by Marquis de Taigeis
      on 2022-09-26 18:05
    • +300

      by JetpackMonkey
      on 2022-09-25 00:33
    • +100

      by kaibrightwing
      on 2022-09-22 20:32
    • +100

      by A Frightened Kobold
      on 2022-09-22 16:51
    • +100

      by Rayna Fairbell
      on 2022-09-22 12:45
    • +100

      by Melora
      on 2022-09-20 09:04
    • +100

      by Nimsy
      on 2022-09-20 06:12
    • +100

      by DaisyChick
      on 2022-09-19 21:17
    • +300

      by A Goodhearted Goblin
      on 2022-09-19 13:52
    • +100

      by A Adorable T-Rex
      on 2022-09-19 06:13
    • +1

      by A Wild Bananafolk
      on 2022-09-19 01:23
      .<. maybe not slaves but animal/pets info would be cool!
    • +300

      by Mournblade94
      on 2022-09-18 22:17
    • +100

      by Drakolisk Lord
      on 2022-09-18 21:28
    • +300

      by A Revolutionary Cthulhu
      on 2022-09-18 11:12
    • +1

      by A Rambunctious Bananafolk
      on 2022-09-18 10:49
    • +300

      by fwalton
      on 2022-09-18 01:34
    • +300

      by Psychonaut
      on 2022-09-17 17:35
    • +100

      by Adcheryl
      on 2022-09-17 09:49
    • +1

      by storyauthor
      on 2022-09-17 05:26
    • +300

      by danieln
      on 2022-09-17 00:43
    • +300

      by NovaTerra
      on 2022-09-17 00:43
    • +1

      by AuraGuard
      on 2022-09-16 18:35
    • +100

      by Morielen
      on 2022-09-16 10:58
    • +300

      by Galahad423
      on 2022-09-16 02:42
      Would second the ethnicity affiliation idea for organizations as well
    • +300

      by Ratha
      on 2022-09-16 01:43
    • +100

      by Vibeca
      on 2022-09-15 21:32
    • +300

      by A Lusty Orc
      on 2022-09-15 12:38
    • +300

      by Willow H.R. Harper
      on 2022-09-15 11:45
    • -1

      by ddaniel
      on 2022-09-15 09:38
      It would be nice to have an ethnicity relation thing like for organizations, where you can do the same thing (and status can describe what you wish here), but I don't think a specific field is needed for it.
    • +100

      by Tijmuhn
      on 2022-09-15 07:58
    • +300

      by Dundy
      on 2022-09-15 00:04
    • +300

      by Tatortotzke
      on 2022-09-15 00:03
    • +300

      by voidbreath
      on 2022-09-14 22:09
    • +100

      by Lima141
      on 2022-09-14 20:46
    • +300

      by JoellaKay
      on 2022-09-14 20:16
    • +300

      by Logan Mountain
      on 2022-09-14 18:18