+300

by A Mischievous Goblin
on 2023-08-23 07:54

+300

by scottc1226
on 2023-08-23 00:58

+300

by HomeboundREx
on 2023-08-22 22:49

I have no doubt this has been asked before. Do I still want this? Yes.

+100

by fantasticat
on 2023-08-20 01:16

+300

by Leighton Carden
on 2023-08-19 18:39

There are loads of types my setting calls for that an aren't standard and aren't included. I would love this.

+1

by arsenicalchemist
on 2023-08-19 16:17

+300

by Imper1um
on 2023-08-18 16:08

Being able to specify the list of subtypes for each type would be nice. There are some items that just don't fit into the categories that WA offers; WA is built for fantasy RPG, and there is very little support for futuristic RPG campaigns, with many things that futuristic RPGs fit into that don't exist in a fantasy-themed setting (and so they aren't on the list).

+300

by speagle
on 2023-08-18 15:37

+100

by Ironpanda
on 2023-08-18 04:59

+300

by Vguadagno
on 2023-08-16 20:25

+300

by BilboSherlock
on 2023-08-16 14:15

+300

by ShadowCook
on 2023-08-16 03:24

+300

by Sehanbrel
on 2023-08-14 11:22

+300

by cerdicthewolf
on 2023-08-13 13:34

+300

by A Rambunctious Goblin
on 2023-08-12 16:49

+100

by raptorbricks
on 2023-08-11 22:39

+100

by kythnos
on 2023-08-11 11:31

+300

by A Mischievous Elf
on 2023-08-10 10:25

Not everyone wants to mess with code, and besides, it'd be nice not to have to to begin with. The lists are already so long to be unwieldy in some places, too.

+100

by SomeRandomGuyFTW
on 2023-08-10 09:42

-1

by A Sneaky Orc
on 2023-08-10 03:14

Some others have pointed to a solution with the Key and value BBCode command. Doing this just seems unnecessary.

+100

by Thootjuh
on 2023-08-09 18:19

+300

by Rayna Fairbell
on 2023-08-09 17:32

+100

by juniperjones
on 2023-08-09 15:57

Saves time for the staff and adds functionality to non-code-minded people? Yes please!

+100

by Slinkadath
on 2023-08-09 05:12

+100

by Madame Vera
on 2023-08-09 01:59

+300

by A Lusty Orc
on 2023-08-08 22:33

+100

by infantry249
on 2023-08-06 14:28

+100

by hwcarver
on 2023-08-06 11:31

Just because it's possible to do with code doesn't mean it wouldn't be nice to have it in the GUI. Especially if you could also delete types from the list in a Type Quick Editor.

+100

by GreeneDragon
on 2023-08-06 00:35

-1

by JoellaKay
on 2023-08-04 19:40

Letting anyone add items to the dropdown lists for types would quickly make the entire list unmanageable. (Even if it was only per user, that's going to become a feature role, for example the user would want to delete mistakes, etc.) I think the current solution of using key::value is good.

+300

by GM Ryu
on 2023-08-04 04:49

-1

by A Enfeebled Dryad
on 2023-08-03 06:40

-100

by UnknownWriter88
on 2023-08-03 01:54

Like amelianite said, this is already possible

-1

by amelianite
on 2023-08-03 00:12

You can already doing this in the sidebar section with

Key::Value--, such as --Type

Capital

+300

by halduron
on 2023-08-02 22:40

+300

by ArtMonkey
on 2023-08-02 20:16

+300

by Mconk1515
on 2023-08-02 16:14