Follow up

• +100

  by catlandia
  on 2022-04-24 12:51

• +300

  by dre569
  on 2022-04-19 14:12

  Yes please

• +100

  by Tijmuhn
  on 2022-04-18 20:23

• +300

  by A Fluffy Velociraptor
  on 2022-04-18 19:35

  Yeah, I'll admit I've seen a few things that are little bit lacking, but not everyone can think of everything at the same time.   As for the Suggestive Warfare; I think faults lay on both sides, unintentional yours, and intentional theirs.   Yeah, your statement was a little direct, maybe mildly demanding, but it still holds as a valid point (but maybe not as peace loving as others would prefer though).   Though as a born member of the demographic where both types of communication and analytical issues occur, perhaps some of the over-responders might consider how their reactionary content could make the W.A community look.   Developing a patient and skilled mind in the art of taking your time with what you're reading in a calm and open minded manner is just as important (if not more) as thinking about how you should structure your suggestion and express your feelings.

• +50

  by TheTinyTyro
  on 2022-04-15 03:02

• +300

  by Vexey
  on 2022-04-14 10:11

• +300

  by Gaggle of GMs
  on 2022-04-13 20:28

• +300

  by zalzabar
  on 2022-04-13 07:22

• +300

  by Arlatius
  on 2022-04-13 01:57

• +100

  by Willow H.R. Harper
  on 2022-04-12 16:17

• +100

  by Falconflight2000
  on 2022-04-12 16:16

  yea that would be nice

• +300

  by A Rambunctious Orc
  on 2022-04-10 12:14

• +300

  by cmmebstd
  on 2022-04-10 11:50

• +300

  by NovaTerra
  on 2022-04-10 11:03

• +300

  by VorpalJoe
  on 2022-04-10 02:41

• +300

  by ddaniel
  on 2022-04-09 12:15

  Politics aside, I also have ran into this problem. I have a nation whose ruler is also automatically part of an organization (like an alliance of nations, let's say something like NATO) and I wanted them to show up as both notable members of the nation (as their leader) and the organization (as a member)

• +50

  by UnknownWriter88
  on 2022-04-09 01:19

• +100

  by AuraGuard
  on 2022-04-09 01:16

  As a point of constructive criticism: While verbal tone cannot be communicated in text, it is possible for the written word to come across as rude or short, and while it is difficult to impossible to completely avoid the risk of reader misinterpretation, it does come upon the writer to nonetheless make the attempt to ensure that their wording is, minimally, as clear as possible as to what they intend to say.   Additionally, I would recommend working further on punctuation and proofreading, as it was difficult for me to read your followup due to inconsistent (and awkward) punctuation (especially with placement or lackthereof of commas), and also due to occasional awkward word choice.   Note that I only offer this critique due to your followup specifying 'critique is not an attack' in a manner that made it sound like you advocate for constructive critique. As such, I offer you some constructive critique to help improve your ability to communicate in the written word, by pointing out areas that could use some work.   That all aside: I, too, would much appreciate the ability to make a character have multiple primary organizations - I have a few characters who play major roles in multiple organizations, some of whom are of vital plot importance (or are even main protagonists). It'd be nice to have them show up as important under more than one organization.

• +300

  by dragonshadow58
  on 2022-04-08 17:11

• +300

  by Graylion
  on 2022-04-08 14:26

  I ran into this as a problem also, however I would agree I would love to the the characters listed under the organization in a secondary position. Maybe calling them members not notable members.
  And for the Wild Skeleton I find the your tone no more respectful.
  

• -100

  by A Roaring Devil
  on 2022-04-08 04:22

• -300

  by A Wild Skeleton
  on 2022-04-08 03:26

  Do you understand the meaning of primary? Because the suggestion is kind of changing that.   I think, what you mean is that you'd like is if a user has an organization as a secondary, this character to also appear on the organization page. - With that I agree, but this is not what the suggestion is about.  

  ---

  P.S. Saying "I have paid for this so they should do it for me" is showing how much respect you have for people and the way you treat others. This was the primary reason I have gone for -300. it's not only what we are suggesting that is important, it is also how. This community was built on mutual respect.

• +300

  by A Lusty Goblin
  on 2022-04-08 03:06

• +300

  by ProStashio
  on 2022-04-07 21:44