Ov language Language in Allwanduir | World Anvil
BUILD YOUR OWN WORLD Like what you see? Become the Master of your own Universe!

Remove these ads. Join the Worldbuilders Guild

Ov language

Written by Orikrin1998

Ov (autonym: Yhngnäs, /yːŋ͡næs/) is the most spoken language in Allwanduir. Spoken by 212 million people as a native language, it is the official lingua franca of Allwanduir with approximately 1.3 billion second language speakers.   Ov is the main language of the Okhakian language family, which has a total of 417 million native speakers, making it the largest language family of Allwanduir.  
The word Yhngnäś comes directly from Proto-Ov *oxa qneopepets, which translates as "language of the peoples". *Oxa also has a direct descendant in yh, "psalm", and *qneob gave rise to the modern word ngnäb, "tribe".
 

History

 
Allwanduirian years
Physical / Metaphysical Law | Mar 16, 2019
 
The ancester of Okharian languages appeared in 9,200 BN, but Ov emerged only in 6,712 BN when the first duly dated document, showing Okharian inscriptions, was discovered.
  Ov retrospectively gave its name to the Proto-Ov language, as it is now the most spoken language in Allwanduir and therefore the most representative of the Okharian family. Old Ov itself gave birth to several widely spoken and closely related languages, the Okhar-Shkenzi subfamily.

Writing System

The writing system of Ov is an alphabet named Ofsar.  

Ov alphabet

  It also has an ornamental font.  

Phonology

Ov has a reasonably large consonantal inventory consisting of 19 phonemes: three nasals /m n ŋ/, six plosives /p b t d k g/, six fricatives /f v θ s ɕ x/, three liquids /l ɫ̪ r/ and an affricate /t͡ɕ/.   The vocalic inventory is relatively large, with 10 different vowels by quality (/i: y: ɪ ʏ e æ u ɤ o ɑ/), of which 5 can also be distinguished by length (adding the following to the inventory: /e: æ: u: o: ɑ:/.  

  Arguably, /i: y:/ are also distinguished by length compared to /ɪ ʏ/ but their quality is also different, which makes them separate phonemes (same goes with German, or English regarding the /ɪ/). The vowel /ɤ/ is the only vowel that cannot be lenghtened outside of these two.   The short vowels are slightly lower than their long counterparts.  

Allophony

  Ov undergoes quite a bit of allophony in consonants. In vowels, we can simply notice the very common /ɪ u/ → [j w] in contact with another vowel.   Many voiced fricatives lack, but [ð] for /d/ is found before /r/, as well as [ɣ] for /g/ in many environments.   The liquid /r/ has such a widespread allophone in [ɾ̝] that many linguists consider this should be the actual phoneme by now, and a dialectal variation.   Ov completely lacks phonemic palatal consonants, but after a front vowel (except in <rł>) or <p>, [ç] is the allophone of /x/. This feeds a transformation of /n/ into [ɲ] before that latter allophone.   Finally, /θ/ can combine with many consonants to form an allophonic [ɬ], or even the cluster [t͡ɬ].  

Stress

  Stress in Ov is not lexical, yet the language is heavily stress-timed. There is no tone nor secondary stress, and slight vowel reduction occurs.   The base rule for the position of stress is the following:  
  • stress is final if the word ends in a plosive consonant (zëvit [t͡ɕɘ.ˈvɪt]
  • stress is penultimate if the word ends in any other phoneme (lougwiś [ˈl̪ow.gʷɘs]; iełema [ʝɛ̈.ˈçe̞.mə]).
  Now for the exceptions:  
  • compound words keep the stress of their first item (skueiëcan [ˈɕkʷe̞ɪ̯.θn̩]; śyhfkaizean [ˈsyːf.kəɪ̯.t͡ɕən]
  • long vowels are always stressed, no matter the first rules (Azihtkana [ə.ˈt͡ɕiːt.kə.nə]).
 

Vowel Reduction

  Ov undergoes vocalic reduction on unstressed vowel, not as strong as in Russian, yet enough to cause syncope.   Here is the general pattern:  
  • /ɪ,ʏ/ > [ɘ,ɵ]
  • /u/ > [ʊ]
  • /e̞,o̞/ > [ɛ̈,ɔ̈]
  • /æ,ɑ,ɤ/ > [ɐ~ə]
  Syncope is not bound to rules, it's more generally linked to the "feel" speakers have of their language, and it varies a lot dialectally. Yet, it often happens with asonantal endings such as plurals (this is shown in Future Ov, where syncope was sometimes lexicalized and caused the spelling of some flexions to diverge). For example, dalyhryk has five ways of being very narrowly marked down:  
  • [dɑˈlyːɾ̝ʏk] (unreducted; rare or emphatic) ;
  • [dəˈlyːɾ̝ɵk] (reducted trivocallically, formal speech) ;
  • [dəˈlyːɾ̝ɵ̥k] (reducted and unvoiced trivocallically, common in casual speech with or without dialectal influence) ;
  • [dəˈlyːɾ̝k] (syncopated, also common in casual speech with or without dialectal influence) ;
  • [d͡ɮʏɾ̝k] (doubly syncopated, super fast speech).
  Retaining the vowel can be done for epenthesis, but the epenthetic particle ea will be preferred for that purpose.   Other examples:  
  • /mo̞.nɑ.ly:.ɾ̝ɑm/ → [mɔ̈.n(ɐ).ˈly:.ɾ̝ɐm]
  • /ɪç.nɒɪ̯.stɪ.ŋjæ/ → [ɘç.nɐɪ̯ˈstɪ.ŋjə]
  • /θe̞.ɕwe̞ɪ̯.o̞ɑ.stɑn/ → [θɛ̈ɕ.wɛ̈ɪ̯.wəˈstɑn]
  • /ʏf.me̞.to̞:l.kɤ/ → [ɵf.mɛ̈.ˈto̞:l.kə]
  • /ki:.ɾ̝ɒn.læ.me̞ɪ̯l/ → [ˈki:.ɾ̝ɐn.lɐm.ɛ̈ɪ̯l]

Morphology

Ov is moderately synthetic, which contributes to its look made equally of long and short words. The roots are usually monosyllabic but many words are formed through composition. Verbs are also usually formed by null derivation from the nouns.   All paradigms are widely based upon assonances. Usually, an ending is supported by the optional addition of the last vowel into the paradigm: -at + -t = -atat. The future tense is in this case (nuksar, "to allocate", becomes nuksarsan, "I will allocate"), but the past and present tenses differ: they both use the first vowel of the word as a break (nuksar becomes nuksarus, "I allocate") but since the past tense uses an -in- infix, the <i> is always used for it (ninuksaris, "I allocated").  

Nominal morphology

  There is no grammatical genders, but four numbers: singular, plural, indefinite ideal ("any") and total ("all").   There are two sets of declensions: the syntactic paradigm, which is numbers distinguished by nominative or ergative, and the semantic paradigm, constituting of benefactive, instrumental, genitive, inessive, ectessive and locative.   Additionnally, the declensions are distinguished through three different kinds of harmonizations that impacted the proto-words. Nowadays, these patterns are called consonantal harmony:  
  • the plosive harmony is the paradigm for words of which the last consonant is among /m n ŋ p b t d k g/;
  • the fricative harmony is the paradigm for words of which the last consonant is among /f v θ s ɕ x/;
  • the null harmony is the paradigm for any other words (ending in /r l ɫ̪/ or no consonant).
    Ov also expresses possession through affixes that adapt to the consonantal harmony. Remarkably, there are two kinds of possession: direct possession, where the possessee is actually owned, and indirect possession, for cases that would translate in English as "my son" or "my problems", where the possessee does not belong to someone, nor is held by them. A construct case is also used when the situation is inambiguous.   The absolutive case is only marked for animate nouns and uses a vocalic shift rather than an ending. The same kind of shift is visible for definite plural (a plural ending applying on items of which the amount is clearly known and above 3).  

Verbal morphology

  The tense system of Ov is misleadingly simple: it consists only of present, past and future distinguished in first, second and third person and their plurals. This is highly regular. The system stands out from the comparison with occidental languages by its synthetic passive paradigm.   The Ov verbal system also has four moods: causative (now dated), negative, imperative and subjunctive. The subjunctive can agree with the present or the non-present tense. Additionnally, all these moods can agree with the active or passive voice.   The subjunctive is triggered by the modal verb onto the main verb, or by relative clauses. The language is heavily verb-initial, to the point that all verbs of a given clause will be stacked at the beginning of the sentence. This is where complex rules of verbal agreement, varying a lot depending on formality and obsoleteness, come into play.

Syntax

Ov is VSO and strongly verb-initial. All the verbs of a given sentence are stacked at the beginning.   Ov is an ergative language and generally head-initial, but that isn not a strict rule for adjectives and nouns. Ov speakers will normally go for euphony. There is even an epenthetic particle, ea, that is used at will to break consonantal clusters across word boundaries.   Quite notably, Ov uses postpositions.  

Relative clauses

  Relative clauses are taken care of in two different ways.   The first way looks like what English does: a relative pronoun is used and the clause follows normally, with the exception that it triggers subjunctive on the verb.   The second way is more tricky but also more common. It is quite difficult to tackle for non natives as the boundaries of the relative clause are not clearly shown anymore, as there is no relative pronoun in this case. The verb is put in the future tense and the following noun in the ergative.

Vocabulary

The Ov language as we know it encompasses over 5,900 words. Here is an excerpt.  
Ar /ɑɾ̝/
Life
 
Cëp /θɪp/
Tooth
 
Cíel /θiːe̞l/
Love (v./n.)
 
Crohszt /θɾ̝oːst/
Bitter
 
Ëps /ɪpɕ/
Action
 
Kohp /koːp/
Bone
 
Läś /læs/
Sky / heaven
Nara /nɑɾ̝ɑ/
Death
 
Plöië /ɫ̪ʏɪ̯/
Work (v./n.)
 
So /ɕo̞/
Be able to
 
Storvek /ɕto̞rve̞k/
Beach
 
Swa /ɕvɑ/
Water
 
Vytín /vʏtiːn/
Red
 
Wäi /væɪ̯/
Cat
Root Languages
Common Phrases
Cíelis niw.
I love you.
Ofor tiereë bonkszyhr.
The duck is learning mathematics.
Ylyś moi yngs luś?
When do we get the free food?
U ënszoks ioul iämszäsäl.
Steel is heavier than feathers.
Common Female Names
Käsztsyn, Celyn, Välcin, Yhzä
Common Male Names
Śäs, Dorkin, Doran, Dengan

Remove these ads. Join the Worldbuilders Guild

Articles under Ov language


Guild Feature

Display your locations, species, organizations and so much more in a tree structure to bring your world to life!

Comments

Please Login in order to comment!
Feb 9, 2019 09:51

This is an incredibly detailed article on the language. I think you know more about this than I do about my native language. :D   Some questions or notes:   "The planet is home to several major sentient species cohabiting, of which only one, humanoid, has developed oral language."   I got this from your introduction to the world, which makes me wonder: how do the other sentient species interact with this language? Do they lack the physical attributes necessary to speak, or are they really primitive?   If the former is true, I'm curious about the dynamic between those who can speak it and those who cannot. Socioeconomics take a large part in changing dialects in language - is that a thing in this world, too? Where the non-speaking aliens write or use technology to imitate speech with a flair that easily sets them apart from the Allwanduirians?   What about common slang? (or as Janet calls it: conslang) Is there any particularly common or systemic ways people shorten or modify things?   I would love to see more context-in-the-world stuff like that, and it could help you fill out the side panel or help you break up the text with quote blocks, perhaps. :)   For the vocabulary on the end, I would consider putting it in 2 or even 3 columns to shorten the scroll.   As a nitpick: "The Ov language as we know it encompasses over 5,900 words."   As who knows it? :) Is the tone of the article that of an explorer or teacher explaining it to someone? Is it written more in-universe?   Also-also: Don't forget there is a comment-feedback option under the "Preference" when you edit the article. That way, you can specify more what kind of feedback you are looking for and would be helpful to you. :)   Awesome work, amazing article :D


Creator of Araea, Megacorpolis, and many others.
Feb 9, 2019 16:57 by Ywan Cooper

Hello and thanks for that detailed comment. :-o This is my first ever article on WA, so your feedback on how to format things are precious.   All the sentient species are about equally intelligent. I didn't figure out yet what this would mean for the world, but I'm looking forward to encountering opportunies to flesh it out. Also, yes, only the Allwanduirians are able to speak at all, although I will probably make an ambiguous language for a species, having them to use sounds better than any speech-ambiguous animal on Earth (whales etc).   I don't mean to be mushy but Allwanduir will probably be a peaceful world where collaboration between people and species will lead to sharing technology and wind up with a global understanding all of the sentient beings. *wipes away a tear of joy*   WA is actually not the cradle of Ov, and you can learn many more things if you browse this: @https://conworkshop.com/view_language.php?l=BHO. That's where slang hides.   Now, when I say "The Ov language as we know it encompasses over 5,900 words", it is true that I'm not making much sense. I meant to immerse my reader into the language without having to say "I made 5,900 words in Ov" because that's silly (but that's, in fact, what it meant).   I'll look into your other suggestions in good time. Nuik tden ör! <3

Feb 9, 2019 18:15

If this is your first article, holy heck! :D It's a fantastic start. I'm not great at conlanging myself, but it looks pretty dang stellar.   And hey, there's nothing wrong with an idyllic utopia! I look forward then to seeing what else you cook up here on WA! :)   (Oh hey, I see you put the vocabulary in columns! :D )


Creator of Araea, Megacorpolis, and many others.
Feb 10, 2019 01:51 by Ywan Cooper

Yep, I changed a few things following your recommendations! I've been conlanging actively for almost three years now and this is really the activity I like the most. Thanks for your feedback. <3

Feb 9, 2019 23:52

1: Positive comment; Seems to be fit to use as an actual language considering how thorough of a structure this has. This level of detail while unlikely to come through in nearly any work is a sign of your dedication and passion to it. 2: Negative comment: Since it's the Lingua franca of the world unless it is visibly written on an image (assuming images are present in your work such as animation, game or video game) the alphabet is not going to feature anywhere as the work will be written in the reader's preferred language. Seems like wasted effort into it though I could be wrong and passion should not be stifled for the sake of efficiency 3: question; The time line at the top was quite intriguing to me, were there specific events in history that lead to changes in the languages? For instance a portion of a nation being taken into another as a result of war, the separation of another due to a crisis of succession? I find myself more curious about the history of the language than I do the language itself. If this page is to be seen by consumers of your work (Readers, players, viewers etc) perhaps adding those would be a good idea, plus give your world an expanded universe

Feb 10, 2019 02:05 by Ywan Cooper

Hello, thanks for your feedback. <3   The alphabet is not actually wasted time. The writing systems are regarded as fonts and I use them for derivative works (like the crosswords you can find in the subarticles).   The timeline's specific events are related to scientific discoveries, like the year 6,712 BN. The rest is from linguistic reconstructions that set up arbitrary limits (just like between Old English, Middle English and so on). There's a bit more info on the article about Okharian languages.

Feb 11, 2019 04:38 by Dryant Feywright

This is a very interesting language! I must say, it seems like you took a lot of time to figure out the structure and phonology of the language. Just a random idea; perhaps maybe a dictionary if possible? Anyway, keep on writing, friend!

Feb 12, 2019 01:26 by Ywan Cooper

It's too big to be exported, you can find it right here. And thanks. <3

Feb 11, 2019 07:49

Oof, IPA. I tried IPA before, never got the hang of it. Which leads into... well, this is an amazingly detailed article, nearly incomprehensible to anyone but a linguist. Heavy use of IPA, which most people can't read, at least not without a guide. Even *more* extensive use of linguistic jargon. It may be extremely interesting, but not being a linguist, I couldn't really say.

Feb 12, 2019 01:11 by Ywan Cooper

It's okay! :-D Conlangers know this kind of stuff, I'm not any close to the skills of a linguist. But it's specialized worldbuilding alright. ^_^ I'll do different articles in the future, I just like languages a lot. And thanks!

Feb 22, 2019 18:58

I found your work on this language really impressive ! Do/Did you study linguistics ? I read your introduction article, and i think the idea is really interesting. Maybe it's a bit naif to imagine a so important technology could don't change the world, but why not. :) I just have one question : is there magic in your world ? Seriously, i'm really curious about what you will do whit this world, especially if you always do things as developed as this one. ;) Beautiful work, really. Congratulations !   PS : Sorry for my English, i'm not a native English speaker.

Feb 23, 2019 00:03 by Ywan Cooper

Don't worry, I'm not a native English speaker either. As a matter of fact, I was homeschooled, so I didn't "study" anything. I've been learning linguistics on my own for as long as I have a passion for languages; that makes almost five years now.   There will be no magic in Allwanduir, as I'm not into fantasy stuff. This will be a hard scifi kind of work, with as much realism as I will manage to infuse into it.   Thanks a lot for your feedback regardless. <3 <3 <3

Feb 25, 2019 18:05

I really like the article, especially the alphabet! I also neeed an explanation to why 'the duck is learning mathematics' is such a common phrase

Feb 28, 2019 17:23 by Ywan Cooper

Thanks! Not necessarily common haha, I just thought it was a fun phrase, and I'd already translated it, so…